There may be trouble ahead…

Subscribe to updates from our blog.

Recent Posts

rebirth butterfly

Rebirth

Starting again needs vision, energy, and a very particular set of governance skills. If I had my time

Read More »
layering

Layering

What does long term governance look like? Charities, via their trustees and senior management, often worry about long

Read More »
There may be trouble ahead...

There may be trouble ahead…
Cautionary tales from governanceland

Over the past few months, the Charity Commission has, customarily, undertaken a number of formal statutory inquiries and other interventions into the conduct of charities by trustees. The Commission’s published reports reveal a number of trends in failure, none of which are new but all of which provide lessons and reminders for trustees in governing their own charities: learning from others’ mistakes.

Back to those lessons from failure: defaults are either deliberate or accidental. Those who deliberately set out to defraud the public, mismanage a charity, or profit personally from a charitable arrangement are difficult to re-educate. The regulators hopefully keep such activity to a minimum. However, those who accidentally fail to fulfil their role as a trustee include those who are either muddled or unaware of their responsibilities. As suggested, the same faults tend to recur time and time again, so if we were to conduct this review in a couple of years’ time, the results would be strikingly similar – just make sure you’re not in the list! Happily, we can all learn from cautionary tales, so here are some lessons to beware:

Breach of trust: any situation involving a trustee not complying with their duties and responsibilities can be a breach of trust, but this tends to include a breach of rules set out in the governing document, mismanaged conflicts of interest, or default as regards a clear legal duty or requirement – such as with a property transaction, financial or fundraising matter, or safeguarding issue.

Poor record keeping: admin should not be considered dull: it can form a fundamental information record for compliance, transparency, and governance purposes. This includes minutes and other notes of decisions, professional advice obtained, registers for conflicts of interest and other matters, safeguarding incidents, serious incidents of other kinds, and maintaining and filing accounts.

Conflicts of interest: this involves an arrangement under consideration by the charity which also has the potential for a financial or other benefit for a trustee personally or a person or organisation closely associated with a trustee. Conflicts are an inevitable and acceptable part of life but they must be identified and properly dealt with.

Failure to comply with the governing document or the law: this includes a departure from the charity’s objects, a breach of powers set out in the governing document, or a failure in connection with the appointment or role of trustees or members. It also covers a failure to comply with the law on any area of a charity’s operations, so the scope is as broad as the work of any charity.

This last category leads me to point out the obvious … if you preface any of the duties of trusteeship with ‘failure to …’ this provides a corresponding list of the defaults found in the Commission’s work! So, engage with your duties and responsibilities and thus minimise the chance of failure of these.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


© 2025 Knight Charity Governance – All Rights Reserved. Designed by Merlin’s Web

This Website uses cookies. Visit our Privacy Policy for more information.